Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Shem; 931711"
It is unlikely that this picture is specially written by Korovin, because there's nothing close. She and her author simply the victim.
|
of Shem, I do not quite understand: Victims of what?
Discussed on the landscape, judging by the photos, the signature is not applied on wet, of course, but do not rule out that the semi-dried out ink layer, paint, as they say - "with the author's palette."
Nor would I
specifically this picture so immediately stigmatize and bad words: after the last exhibition in the Tretyakov Gallery, I think, many ideas about creativity KAKorovin great change. Not everyone, for example, to see so many of the early works of the master. (Clearly aware that my words can cause a storm of indignation from the experts on creativity Korovin <! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 1 ~ ->).
And what about "nothing to do" - I, too, would have been more careful. For what is common, for example, between "the Mall in Zhukovka" in 1888 from the collection of the Museum - Reserve "Polenova," and say, "River in men'shovoy" in 1885 (from the same collection)? Yes, absolutely nothing! Meanwhile, both the landscape - the undisputed work of KA
So I would still showed landscape specialist. And (to start) - not necessarily a specialist in creativity Korovin, but just a good expert. On the subject of the establishment of the establishment. They will say - "middle - the second half of the twentieth century" - that's when you can really discuss how, by whom and for what purpose landscape was created, and it is necessary, whether the author rescued. <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
Sincerely, Dt.