Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 08.03.2009, 15:31 Язык оригинала: Русский       #80
Гуру
 
Аватар для redbor
 
Регистрация: 26.01.2009
Сообщений: 4,911
Спасибо: 799
Поблагодарили 1,712 раз(а) в 1,079 сообщениях
Репутация: 3349
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Tana Посмотреть сообщение
and its head should be, look at pictures of clover, take a day or week, consider them all to the last detail, "szhivites with them and then look for" it "that there is still need
Well I do not have one head, which is needed. I'm trying to use a more intelligent, because I'm here ..
I see now, I read the act, where reasonably and clearly explains why this picture was painted by Klever. I have all the same who signed the act.
   Why should not I believe?
The main, me, not a specialist on clover, all understandable.
  If someone is also reasonably explained
Clover why could not write this now, I'm ready to believe.
  I reach for knowledge, I would just who explained clearly, and I'll usvoyu.
So when people say they can identify and clover, and who they are,
I'm glad.
Is not always so lucky, to communicate with the specialist and learn new and useful. I inquire how? why? I think that I will explain.
They will show an example of comparison with reference standards, etc.
... But now many pages covered with writing, but in addition:
  -as a compliment,
   -T.Bychko substantive justification ... b,
    and say once again, this is bullshit. " Nothing new.
Is that equating himself to a musician, catching the falsity ...
But, I am familiar with a musician, and he always I was not a musician ready to explain
where the falsity, whether highly. Does low, what note is played incorrectly ...
  And to just blurted out "This goat is false" I have not heard from him.
  So if you, ladies and gentlemen, see the hypocrisy in this picture - please
Tell me where and in what way. Where differences from the reference Clever?

  Although I really do not hope. I'm up to this figure does not care, but truth is dearer.
Therefore had to learn tel. № mentioned here Irina Rustamova yesterday telephoned and congratulated in coming,
received approval for a consultation on the picture.
... As charge people (as those of Kiev experts Bychkov and ..) in the forgeries, etc., - did not confirm this evidence, is at least disreputable and it is called slander. Or show her pereatestovanny act and from whom it received the money for forgery or not say anything, as it were Stobie not happen like hex.
  This is actually a transcription of the Gospel truth.



redbor вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо redbor за это полезное сообщение:
Артём (08.03.2009), Кирилл Сызранский (08.03.2009), наследник (08.03.2009)