Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 04.04.2013, 01:36 Язык оригинала: Русский       #17
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 26.03.2009
Адрес: Санкт-Петербург
Сообщений: 2,126
Спасибо: 361
Поблагодарили 1,022 раз(а) в 433 сообщениях
Репутация: 2125
По умолчанию

What can I say after these photos. Yes, perhaps nothing new. I'll ask just one more sharp in the macro picture of the part that stood out.

Well, about the painting can say one thing and the most important - Janson -Manizer of those sculptors who create objects do not require any decoration ( paintings). Sculpture she created in basis - bronze, that never rospisyvalis . And those that were created in china - and not rospisyvalis and remained in their underwear, because to the level of that of the sculptor - just language plastics. She made ​​sculptures , and not " nakomodniki ."
So again :
1. Option originality - Paintings ( Evgeny Oleynik ) is created on the personal initiative on the original figure.
2. Option bullshit - painting done under the authorship Oleynik E. perhaps the figure using the original cast bronze sculpture , which served as a model.

I will not say 100%no either. Give pliz photo.
In general, these controversies on the photo is not correct to attribute .
In what city figure?
Миниатюры
Нажмите на изображение для увеличения
Название: 1.jpg
Просмотров: 181
Размер:	297.0 Кб
ID:	1900582   Нажмите на изображение для увеличения
Название: скульптура.jpg
Просмотров: 177
Размер:	310.5 Кб
ID:	1900592  



Михалыч вне форума   Ответить с цитированием