Цитата:
Сообщение от redbor
So we are not here do not have the competence to determine the author's picture and name experts fuflyzhnikami?
... Everything still looks a little strange when people
marked conditional nicknames,
and even does not insist on their knowledge and competence, is accused of forgery and called fuflyzhnikami experts, signed an act of gos.uchrezhdeniya, and not pseudonyms and their real names and functions?.
It place of work and positions of these experts assume all the same, though some,
but competence.?
Moreover, in the act they are given and arguments in favor of authorship. (Khim. analysis)
Unlike their opponents, who were not raised or less comprehensible arguments against.
Note of the interest, I report: a call today, talked to AP and TA
They are ready to listen to all doubts and to 11 the number to answer all questions on this act .
If anyone has any questions to the experts - write in lichku. I'm going to ask them.
Maybe their answers would clarify ..
|
"Conditional nicknames" provide an opportunity to communicate freely. Let me explain. It's no secret that the world of art business is very crowded and is built on personal contacts. Therefore, it is the anonymity gives the necessary impetus for communication in this special forum. And then, the forum - a platform for expression, exchange of useful information and ideas. In short, the main forum - informative, but not personal data. The main thing - it's my opinion and not a position that I occupy. These experts could participate in this forum, keeping his real name and position in secret, relying only on their competence. In other words, it is important is not who and what is said. However, many participants there are discussions at the forum clearly. For many, it's hardly a mystery as to who is behind this or that nickname.
Competence - is the knowledge and experience, and I do not need to insist that I acquired in the course of their professional dyatelnosti. And the extent of my capacity to judge may be people who have business with me.
Perhaps the experts who have et "place of employment and position, and have the knowledge and experience (which, incidentally, not a fact), but I think in this case, rather, of dishonesty and irresponsibility. (Because it is impossible to imagine such a low level of competence among the professionals.)
As an opponent you can argue that, because of the popularity of creativity Klever YY His work poddelavalis during the life of the artist, but chemical analysis has never been a determining factor in the examination of works of art.
With regard to this particular picture, there does not need any tests, but rather go to a museum and look at the real picture of Julia Yul'evich. And then, what is your opinion of the Russian academic school of painting, if you assign a scribble academicians and professors. Understand the level of this thing is so low that it can not belong to the brush is not only academic, but even just a professional artist. So call you at least VV and DA, it is not enough to affect that.
Questions to the "experts" giving such "expertise", I do not. And everything they say, I know, because false clover darkness tmuschaya and dishonorable and unprofessional experts even more.
[color="# 666686"]Posted 15 minutes[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от heir
My wife asks her husband, "Tell me, Fyodor, when you were 25 years ago ... ... beardless Lieutenant proposed to me ... how could you think that you'll sleep with the general's?"
I have this to the fact that academics are not born - they become. And often, not only for painting.
|
The fact that academics are, and not born, I wanted to say. Or you believe that Repin from childhood "Boatmen" wrote? And in the cradle of whistling Tchaikovsky's Swan Lake "?
Could you, as the possessor of unique information to share, for what became an academician Yulievich Julius Klever, if not for the painting?: Confused: I'd like to know.