Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 06.03.2009, 16:59 Язык оригинала: Русский       #36
Гуру
 
Аватар для redbor
 
Регистрация: 26.01.2009
Сообщений: 4,909
Спасибо: 799
Поблагодарили 1,712 раз(а) в 1,079 сообщениях
Репутация: 3349
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Tjutchev Посмотреть сообщение
Do not need either a competency (enough common sense) to understand that the Russian academician can not write well! This is bullshit !!!
Цитата:
Сообщение от uriart Посмотреть сообщение
.. heir, such "experts" need their expertise to ..... Other methods are powerless.
  So we are not here do not have the competence to determine the author's picture and name experts fuflyzhnikami?
  ... Everything still looks a little strange when people
marked conditional nicknames,
and even does not insist on their knowledge and competence, is accused of forgery and called fuflyzhnikami experts, signed an act of gos.uchrezhdeniya, and not pseudonyms and their real names and functions?.
  It place of work and positions of these experts assume all the same, though some,
but competence
.?
Moreover, in the act they are given and arguments in favor of authorship. (Khim. analysis)
Unlike their opponents, who were not raised or less comprehensible arguments against.
  Note of the interest, I report: a call today, talked to AP and TA
  They are ready to listen to all doubts and to 11 the number to answer all questions on this act .
  If anyone has any questions to the experts - write in lichku. I'm going to ask them.
Maybe their answers would clarify ..



redbor вне форума   Ответить с цитированием