Цитата:
Сообщение от Vladimir Vladimirovich
In contemporary cinema, no one will use an expensive antique paintings. Why risk held liable! Unfortunately gone are the days when the frame appeared authentic muskets, swords, painting. Easier to print to print. All the same, the audience will not notice. It would be right preglashat ekspertov.Sovetyvatsya. Semachnaya group follows the path of least cost.
|
In today's movie and not just long ispolzuyutsya not the originals. That is correct, because the original can be damaged by shooting randomly. Sometimes in areas where hang paintings, originals are shooting, and if the pictures are insured, the insurance companies are different terms for hranieniyu paintings and insurance cases and so on, which carries with it certain legal consequences. Sometimes used komyuternaya graphics and collage, which also saves the budget. The same statement that no one will use an antique painting is not quite true, it all depends on the circumstances and goals. In public places visited, I think it is risky to broadcast originals, whether antique or modern painting, from a legal point of view they are equal in value. And the restoration cost is not cheap. Therefore, in such institutions as dressing well and good, in my opinion to use prints.