Цитата:
|
Сообщение от mihailovoh; 2480581"
but said nothing. Means agree with the "never been exhibited known only to a narrow circle of connoisseurs of Briullov and Aivazovsky, Borovikovsky and Repin, Surikov and Serov, Korovin and Kustodiev Roerich and Vrubel, Borisov-Musatov and Lancer, Kandinsky and Malevich, Saryan and Bakst - sometimes unexpected, sometimes completely changing the conventional wisdom about the artist). "
|
Alexander, and as you imagine our possible action? No authority to ensure that require authentication of these works, none of us here (would love to hope
>) - no. Your word, my word, the word is a score even the most respected forum participants - against the venerable words, ostepenennyh art (1 piece) and cultural studies (1 piece). Well, Guess what outweigh? Remember what ended litigation with Mr. Vekselberg's largest auction house. But there it was a lot easier.
I personally do not claim Chaadaeva laurels. There is a remarkable statement - "the syndrome of litigation." I think that she enjoyed as Dr. Dolittle in-it, and continue to use it.
But that is not the point. Let's start with the fact that the very first statement issued over the forum, will be immediately due commented the lawyer (s) of the owner of the collection under discussion. A possible - and lawyers of the State Museum "Tsarina" (there is something certainly has a legal department).
And another scandal nobody wants - tired all ...
At best (if previously issued opinions) owner recheck work Make sure all your own baseless claims, and try to return the money. Ay, sellers! Where are you, good people?
And the most likely - and it will not. It happened, for example, agriculture. Or, say, a sandstorm (option - avalanche) in the Central Administrative District of Moscow. Or (God forbid!) - Fire. About the fire, I'm so afraid even to joke: only lyapni, and it is really looking - and burned ... And the owner was inconsolable at skokototam milen richer. Masterpieces, of course, will not come back, well, what can you do, God has given - God took. And no such treasures were lost forever.
What to do in a situation like this, I honestly do not know. I think it would be bad to hear an intelligent lawyer. (Sorry, that bilingual lawyers rarely give free advice.
>)
Is there a conclusion to all these masterpieces - do not know. Most of all - have.
Well, that
"opinion" the vast majority of active participants of the forum
"about creativity Briullov and Aivazovsky, Borovikovsky and Repin, Surikov and Serov, Korovin and Kustodiev Roerich and Vrubel, Borisov-Musatov and Lancer, Kandinsky and Malevich, Saryan and Bakst " this exhibition is not only
" has not changed ", but not in the least shaken.
>
Added after 1 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzran
What to do, then?
Go to the "Tsaritsyno" and spit on a fake nefalshivo Roerich?
|
CLASS!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>