Цитата:
|
Сообщение от uriart; 2477821"
roman99, you would have made the photo captions oblique light for a better view as she lies on the ink film.
|
Not worth it, right, and time wasting. This opus, as you looked at it (though an oblique light, even at right) to the works of Nicholas Nikanorovich Dubovsky to do. Explain its categorical opinion will not have to believe a word (And where to go ...).
Signature, given the happy owner of etudes, play autograph on a picture "hushed" and published (as a reference) to the countless public directories. And it is - for good reason - most often used is not too literate friends with all kinds of "improvements"
> other people's work. Indeed: and what steam? And so it will come down!
I will tell you a terrible secret golden key: like an autograph, to say the least, for Dubovsky not too characteristic.
> But what's really there to hide - no units of paintings found ...
And studies (ts-with-a, not a word!) NN generally from the right side almost never signed. Even more so - so bold and nazhoristo. He modestly labeled turnovers.
>
>
>