[serg468]

Сообщение от examination

Dear Customer,
Allow me to express our regret that the expert's opinion of your work was negative. Sometimes, in order to come to some kind of result, expert enough visual inspection with the necessary equipment available in our laboratory (MBS, UFL, the IR spectrum). In your case, the expert Ignatova NS, which has for many years engaged in the artists of this period and, in particular, creativity V.E.Makovskogo, such research was enough to recognize the work of authenticity.
We have full confidence to Natalia Sergeyevna and it makes no sense to spend money on costly additional customer research that will not lead to a different result. For such cases, our rates in paragraphs 1 - consultation - worth from 2 to 6ti thousand rubles. In your case, the cost consultation was the minimum amount that is two thousand. If you suffer from any suspicions held consultations Ignatova NS, we are ready, as an exception, you arrange a personal meeting with Natalia in our office in order to make it to you in detail to substantiate their findings.
We hope that your negative remarks were caused solely emotional state, especially as our numerous customers, including those present on this forum, we know that we have the same respect and to major collectors, and people far removed from the antique market .
Sincerely,
NINE his administration. P.M.Tretyakova

I'm too far away to come to you again. Sketch was in our family for a hundred years. I suggest you leave the pictures in the photo baguette, which was a sign, "Prof. VE Makovsky, "you refused. You did not do any expertise in UV nor IR rays. You could not even read a word erased on a stretcher. And there was written "SKETCH", which tried to jam to "sketch" was the picture! You just her "look." Are you ready to show me a similar version of the picture? Not one that hangs in the Tretyakov Gallery, and like me? I think not! And you claim copyist himself made such significant changes in the picture? You are very cool reception to the examination. Any person, even if in some circles he calls himself an expert, are fallible. I think that it is.