Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2451651"
less, of course .
|
It seemed to me a strange picture . Because , first, why the signature on the sleeve ? Work can not be 1829. At the time, the predominant one academic , painting was thin, with other technical and ideological approach , examples below (note that the background of the portrait of a dark and not light , and your picture is very tight underpainting , not liquid, as was made evident unfinished at his hands) . To me, the signature of the image is irrelevant.
Second, a professional artist , but why is the girl so awkward cut right hand?
Third, the picture, which is "a couple of hundred years," not even a little craquelure, even at the crease , and the shine is not a century - an amazing preservation. I have not seen this .
The painting was done on top of the other, can be seen near the signature and the crook . And the bottom layer just gave shedding .
Question. What nails spanned canvas? Kohl stretcher true , then the nails should be the same.
P.S. Kurt Meliha unlikely you'll find , and work of the 20th century.