Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 01.03.2009, 20:34 Язык оригинала: Русский       #3
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 16.06.2008
Сообщений: 3,418
Спасибо: 2,915
Поблагодарили 5,168 раз(а) в 1,142 сообщениях
Репутация: 13013
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky Посмотреть сообщение
fross, flax there they fell, from the oil paints, etc. Somehow ...
I think, divorce, or rather an attempt to divorce, but fall to collectors at this "hook" ... I know that many check pictures of their collections is in such "medicine men" of science. There are examples, as then the owners have been asked to return the money. After 5-6 years! Those who have paid, represent !!!
Yes similar to that of flax (he sure they accumulate, but much less than, for example, potatoes) it is somehow weak. What if the work was somewhere not far from the tests, or then was in contact with the source and so on. I have this to the fact that technically - yes, to detect midget and now even the ultra-small quantities in excess of the samples is possible, but logically built on the basis of these data selection is very doubtful.



fross вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо fross за это полезное сообщение:
Жар-птица (01.03.2009)