Цитата:
|
Сообщение от artcol; 2436491"
Well, what's to argue? It's not even 30 t.dollarov, right?
All can be seen in the works. Artist cultural. Set on a paper in 1928, the other in 1951, but not socialist realist. EXP does not mention it.
If the biography of the artist (or other factors) to add something to it (to work) - they may be higher.
But you can be and its TZ on this occasion - ozvuchte it.
|
The argument that it is not 30t.rubley 30t.dollarov akin famous Humoresque M.Zhvanetskogo "Crayfish" by Roman Kartsev. And yet, God is with him, outlining argumentov.Ved not everyone can like
bykinist to juggle a set of words with the addition of freshly baked homemade doublespeak of "appropriate the" - surely friend wanted to become an art historian, but as a child he was bitten by a clown. ...
The author (or authors) of these pictures is unknown
all. Tale of "According to relatives artist ..." impress, perhaps impulsive elderly ladies yes "dummies", firmly believe in the myth of the purchase of "masterpiece" for 300 rubles ....
If 30 t.rubley evaluate each carton individually, even the "kettle" Ask the seller substantiate their price. And what he hears in return - your "version" (see above)? Or is it - "The artist real, sincere, but not large.
But the real. "
That is certainly in Zhvanetsky - "Yesterday I saw a crayfish ... Three, but yesterday and today were selling for five, but .... toad! <! - ~ 7 ~ ->