Цитата:
|
Сообщение от sdk321; 2418061"
Maybe this article will save as Nina Lapidus
|
Respected Nina (sorry, that no middle name) Lapidus "save" is not necessary. Nobody drowns ...
For his words and "art history opinion" if it bears some responsibility, only - reputation. While in Riga really no other specialists in Russian art (which, I agree - a bit strange, the museum - there is, and professionals - not) - the owners will continue to seek the advice of Ms. Lapidus. And Ms. Lapidus will continue to issue the "acts" (or - not the acts) and Levitan, and Schilder, and Rylov. And also - for Aivazovsky Asknaziya, Beggrow, Bogolyubov (hereinafter - the list). Regardless of whether the works of the author of each of the studied paintings in the collection of the Museum of Riga, or are not ...
But in fact it seemed to me that with these images - all the conclusions already got it, and the subject, as it were closed ... It's not that (one never knows) again arises from the corner formidable figure Masters, and will be broadcast what nasty pictures wrote Repin, Levitan and their ilk ... (With absolutely no hesitation, in what would be a dead faint crashed tenderest Isaac Ilich with a painting by the master himself. Well, if at all, II realized that this painting).
All - Happy.