[Mihail]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Etude good, but I share your enthusiasm they can not. We have Stozharov sketches, really working material, the instantaneous "reportage" straight job, where are all the talent of his pictures.

But it surprises me at all to read. You seem to be an artist, but you can see, in my opinion, what is not.
"Excessive decorative, literary and falsehood in color", can argue with that, but I will not, because just look at the pictures Stozharov to understand the futility of such a dispute.
I mean pictures do not even want to listen, my eye missing. I look at them. And there is nothing close to your definition there can not see.
I think that your profession is in this case you do not help, but on the contrary, does not allow an objective look at the painting Stozharov. What exactly does, I can only guess ... But I'm afraid, my guess, close to the truth.

Kirill, you love Stozharov, but I think it is not especially gifted painter, if you do not see in his painting defects, this does not mean that they do not .. I hope in this dispute there is nothing personal ... it is just different opinions ... compare his paintings, of course not with him, but with a more gifted painters who worked next to him "...