[Кирилл Сызранский]

Today, August 10, 2012, Ilya Farber announced the verdict. 8 (VOSEM!!!) Years in prison, and 3.2 million rubles fine.

The day after the Supreme Court reversed the verdict Tver Regional Court in the case of rural teachers from the village Moshenki Ilya Farber, a meeting of the Bureau of the Russian Jewish Congress (RJC) about this. We have questions that go beyond the particular case, and even the fate of a particular person, although it is not indifferent to us.

The Supreme Court has demanded a retrial, not because questioned the guilt of the defendant. For which there are legal reasons why no one, including the Sun, have no right to cancel the jury's verdict. High Court decision is justified by formal reasons - with the way the hearing. It identified a number of problems: the fact that the jury did not even retired to discuss the verdict in a separate room, to the point that the judge was not wearing a robe.

However, among these there are some details not only alarming, but explains a lot.

For example, the phrase prosecutor at the trial in Tver: "Can a man named Farber free to help the country?".

How to classify it? And how to deal with the fact that the judge Vladimir Andreev she did not object? Especially against the background that the arguments were accepted by the judge prosecutor, and "a man called Farber" he was interrupted, not given even to utter the last word, and then generally removed from the courtroom, and for not returning a verdict?

completely here.