Цитата:
Сообщение от Pavel
Stupidity kind! if you work in a museum that it should be proud. Wash model was overcome greed, such dengi.Pust lies somewhere lezhit.Izyali to save, ze to prodat.Ne izyali would propala.Gospoda noblemen were not very fond of art.
|
Paul!
You must be attentively read the previous posts. Indiscriminately blame the old woman, naterpevshuyusya from the Communists and NKVD, in that it "was overcome greed, at least, inhuman.
The more likely it unknown to those passions that flared around her name on this esteemed site.
From my point of view, picture, of course, can not belong to the model, moreover, that while she was a maximum of 10 years and of course, no one she was not paid for the "sessions". For the same reason - once Konchalovsky not pay - the picture can not belong to the heirs of the artist.
If the picture was in the house Benedikt, then - of course, in the form of a gift or in extreme cases - the result of the sale. However, even if the painting was sold to imagine that Konchalovsky in this case ordered to "check" the composer Benediktov, extremely difficult.
The painting was seized, confiscated - hence its considered property, and there has no value, it is an artistic value or not. As property unlawfully seized during the political repression, the picture must be returned the owner, the house where this thing is.
The only question is whether there is in the nature of the act or an inventory of seized property? How realistic is to find such a document in the archives of the KGB? It is also doubtful that even a copy of the inventory of confiscated kept at the very Pebbles - who would have betrayed her child? Absurd!
Gentlemen I'm not "moved on" - I'm just not a lawyer, not a citizen of Russia, and indeed, the hands are short. " Fight with the state, even in the name of spravdlivosti - alas, not my cup of tea. We must face the truth.