Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Seriy; 2338381"
while in Russia it can somehow disconnected from reality , in the West , for example, in the U.S., you are over 10 thousand dollars a living work of the master , but still good, do not buy. Moreover, the most popular artists you buy from the shop , but in the gallery or at auction.
|
Well, you wrote it , and I have to think about the answer - as there in America (and how it relates to the impressionists and Europe).
The answer is simple - just - look reality
Alphabetical, all the masters :
Vito Acconci (" a key figure in American Video Art ") - Shristie 's prices for healthy work - from 12000 , well 20000.
Ie for 10000 - well, does not get him to buy?
Ghada Amer , it is possible to buy 8-12000 , in the same , with a significant excess of the estimate. While at the same time there is also a very " gain by selling " work.
John Baldessari , a pioneer of conceptual art. 10,15,20000 , along with a very " gain by selling ."
All - auction prices .
Next there is no point to continue , though the list is large and you can find a better example (and cheap) .
In general, the debate no -nonsense reality .
Added after 22 minutes
Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2338391"
Canaletto, Elector of Saxony - all this, of course, very interesting, but here's how you now appreciate Puteyku ?
|
I am not an appraiser, and support advanced by a system of " bargain ."
Puteyku you rate in 2000, which fully complies with the maximum price of the system , as it belongs to the category 4.
If we consider that the restoration of the picture would cost a third of its price, the potential buyer , using your assessment , nothing to lose one-third of capital. Low price , according to the system - lower than 1200 (due to the restoration and anxiety).
Really a socialist realism now sell for $ 800 .