Цитата:
Сообщение от Seriy
Peter, unfortunately, masters widely, bold, flamboyant than the youth.
If we are sad, it is not the quality of the painting, there are a lot of very decent, fine, technically painting (which still life with two porcelain figurines and dark colorful drapery - Konchalovsky resting Cezanne jealous :-), and that for Salakhov, Tsereteli, Konysheva no artists, coming hot on its heels. Why? Paints, canvases lacking in shops like.
|
Seriy, my usual reaction to your message - Nitsche not understand.
First, in a photo next to you is an artist who with specified men and do not have to compete - at different scales, and the competition (sorry for the sports tone)
respektno with-me-respected N. Konysheva this artist wins outright (well here abs voluntaristic IMHO, of course).
Second, if there is "a lot of fine art and technology" - that what is not "stepping on the heels"?
Third, I noticed that you often generalize his person with broader concepts - such as "All of Moscow." There was the opening of "the whole of Moscow." I know a large number of artists, which is a damn.
(That's me, not for detraction exhibition, and to korrrektnosti lighting issue). I went to an exhibition in an hour after the opening -
there were empty rooms. Artists rubles gained some wine and ran - that "All Moscow".
Fourth - I wonder who you think "masters," and any of "young people" do you know? Once in your post "cultural layer" artists tonkovat and a thought - and a fairly representative sample of whether you make your conclusions?
Sobsno it all to the fact that the Russian painting is alive, artists work, there is a lot to see and who learn.
If someone does not see good pictures (including "bold" and "sweeping") - that's his problem.