Interestingly, the problem is exacerbated with the development of the media and especially the Internet, as the happy owner of a priceless works by the artist N, suddenly astonished to find out (in one of the sites) that he is not the only winner, but exactly or very similar "picture" is at the collector K or, which is much nicer in the State Tretyakov Gallery. And then what? What is better - mine or theirs? I have now, and they have a fake-ha-ha, and suddenly (the horror!) Vice versa. The problem however ...
I think that artists do not take into account the rapidly increasing informatization of society and continue to hope that nobody will ever know about their "escapade."
Цитата:
Сообщение от dedulya37
kropotkina-o,
C my point of view, the artists make the author's repetition in several cases:
- Young artists had success with the public, sold well
- When the motive of a picture or etude like the artist himself and he is ready to repeat it again and again
- When they need money badly, but no inspiration
- When the artist is already old and new ideas is not enough and in the open air to go hard
- At the request of someone else - in memory
- According to customer
Here, in my view, essential.
|
I think that the author can be unbearable pity to part with his beloved work. Since it may be connected with something important to the artist.
Цитата:
Сообщение от dedulya37
What people think about the "repetition" and "variant" pictures?
Equally whether these concepts?
Indeed one can say differently. Is the essence?
|
It is interesting, but what about repetitions or versions of "Black Square"?
However, I know the artist, who almost never parted with the originals of his works, and sells a lot.