Цитата:
Сообщение от Vladimir
JM-G,
is this type of people who do not just do not like modern art in general, they are sure that it is in principle, can not please anyone.
|
I am absolutely convinced that there are people who really like modern art, or better say, a certain component of modern art. Very often these people are completely indifferent to all prior art and the other component of contemporary art, and this, in general, it is not surprising, since the criteria are too different.
I think that I have said before that I think that in relation to interest us now part of modern art aesthetic categories are not applicable. To cite one example: in the case of the artist, making his drawing of sperm, it is important to the intention and that intention is outside of these categories, otherwise why not take advantage of diluted sepia (Of course, you can tell me that they feel an urge to urgently establish that any such things, grandiose, over sepia must still run in the specialty shop, and semen, pardon the expression, is always at hand, which I will answer you that this is sexism and self-interest - to be signed in the position of others, and not only think about themselves, so more recently has been the subject of female artists!) - the result would be identical? It is important to
intention.
In the intention that there is nothing shameful or disgraceful, the symbolism of these artists are more straightforward and primitive, but easily uhvatyvaema is a reflection of the outside world, the situation of a person, it would bring to the absurd vices of society ...
I have a temptation to call this phenomenon Peredvizhnichestvo our time - the characteristic that a formal beginning of the modern artists of this type of show as little interest as the Wanderers in their time. Strictly speaking, the public and they have one - is sensitive to social initiation and absolutely indifferent to everything else.