Цитата:
Сообщение от Jasmin
It is strange that such a write on the forum on art <- 8 ~ ~ ->
|
And about peteushnikov when they write online about art - not that strange?
Half of these posts - is trolling personally "great scientist" Syzran, intentional or not.
Rothko - American artist, I do not really understand what is the interest to discuss it in the context of this forum. As Cayce? As the study of the demand for investment in his work?
Here Comrade. Guriev says that modernism
can not be a traditional grading scale (and postmodernism - the more so). Apparently the scale here is different. "Free Pap?" Expression of color? Exemption from the form? But it was already. So what scale? Can Syzran "Real Money" knows?
That's interesting to consider the scale, and the work itself ...
Furthermore, it is very important in my opinion. As a person with "computer education" I used to work with abstractions and reduced entities, which later software can sculpt anything by combining. Rothko and other "abstract" artists completely fit into this paradigm, the picture is not only calculated the computer, and the human brain. But one method - reduction and combinatorics. Hence the simple forms. However komputer is capable of more than the brain Rothko, so why not invest in a computer work? Why not discuss it? And while there are no sales, no cock crowed, all asleep. But Rothko, yes, very important in Syzran.