Тема: Mark Rothko
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 15.10.2012, 19:36 Язык оригинала: Русский       #209
Гуру
 
Аватар для Кирилл Сызранский
 
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 75,482
Спасибо: 27,931
Поблагодарили 55,365 раз(а) в 24,305 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 133
Репутация: 102425
Отправить сообщение для Кирилл Сызранский с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от vg_edger; 2298131"
After the death of Rothko most of his works were in the same hands. After a while, after the standard promotion in exhibitions and special periodicals, they began to appear regularly at auction, formally from many different people, where were bought back by the same owner, again through nominees and increasing costs, the owner is lost commission auction while very small.
This is called as: heard the sound, but does not know where he (c).

Rothko sold for big money by the standards of the then already in his life.
The owner of London's Marlborough Gallery, Frank Lloyd, with whom Rothko had a contract once bought a work of the artist in the 12 m long, and the next day sold for 200,000 - a fact reflected in a criminal case in court, when this picture otsuzhivalis gallery owner, fraudulently attempted to conceal from the heirs of their father's paintings. In general, the price of Rothko in May 1970, when the contract is signed between his foundation and the gallery was 60 thousand for the picture.
By January 1972 Rothko painting has already cost 85 thousand, and the beginning of the court in 1974 - 145 thousand in the United States and the public was shocked: So Lloyd for four years, "Navarro" to deal more than 1000 percent. Having bought the painting from the fund in 1970 to 12 thousand in 1974, he had already sold it for 145.
The case lasted from November 71 th to the end of 1975, Lloyd go on the run, trying to put their American collection from Canada and Europe, but the collection has the last moment been arrested in 1982 by Frank Lloyd gave the prosecutor in New York and has been convicted on three criminal charges at once.
But in fact, and the court, and his decision (by the way, is a unique case in the history of jurisprudence: the U.S. Supreme Court officially recognized the great artist Mark Rothko - four pages were devoted to his sentence in the history of painting), and testimony of witnesses and experts showed all the fraud scheme and the accused was trying to play down the prices for Rothko, though even then the experts talked about buduyuschih millions prices on its products.



Кирилл Сызранский вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Кирилл Сызранский за это полезное сообщение:
zarajara (15.10.2012)