Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 25.09.2012, 23:56 Язык оригинала: Русский       #7
Бывалый
 
Регистрация: 07.09.2011
Сообщений: 269
Спасибо: 159
Поблагодарили 90 раз(а) в 71 сообщениях
Репутация: 180
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzran Посмотреть сообщение
So Tretyakov and did not invest in art - it is a collector and collector of Russian art.

Yes it to these 4300 silver rubles paid to the deceased 's brother , KD Flavitsky for "Princess ", and it is somewhere just over 14 tons francs Impressionists landscape but still lives here and have bought it would have been an investment with a capital letter. A ?
Yes , it would be just a very good investment .
(Russian classicism - French Impressionism : 0-1)

Clear and understandable that venture capital returns were not ( important) , the driving force for the Tretyakov when creating his collection. The question was more about the result of this action (not the good intentions of the great man ) in such a simple and ordinary financial terms.
And if not for the greed of brothers , the picture could well hang somewhere now in the Louvre.



Elek вне форума   Ответить с цитированием