[SAH]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran; 2272081"

And if the bottom line, then, for example, you simply can not now be called the real works of Andrei Rublev and remains common phrases you to post nothing.

More and more you surprise her prinitsatelnostyu and "sober" logic I can not call the real works, why not?

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran; 2272081"

and left you to post platitudes nothing.

Thank you just you is not bad coming out.

Added after 7 minutes

Сообщение от artcol; 2272091"

What kind of specialist Yzhe? The authorship of the Trinity, they do not question?

Hush, hush, not all can be called the real work of the author, not all. Apparently this information deeply secretive or even as, shorter tolerance probably should have. Theme is increasingly becoming one of the most fun lately.

Added after 30 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran; 2272081"

art-stamps, water, figured on cultural education of readers of "worker" and a benefit tour guides for tours of the Tretyakov Gallery for students during the holidays.

For me, the way critics and opinion plays a big role, especially like Alpatov Mikhail Member of the Academy of Arts of the USSR (1954), Honored Artist of the RSFSR (1958). Laureate of the State Prize of the USSR (1974). Worked at the Museum of Fine Arts, in the years 1923-1930 - the Institute of Archeology and Art History RANION. In 1925 he defended a thesis on the history of ancient art, PhD (1940) was the monograph "Italian art of the Dante and Giotto's" (1939). Since 1943 Professor of the Moscow Art Institute named after VI Surikov. Among his students - known contemporary artist Ilya Kabakov. (funny that professional forum participant has to explain the significance of art Alpatova, the genius of a great artist Rublev ....)