And here is the legal precedent. (
http://vashnal.ru)
"So, for example, was not recognized by the business activities to create sketches premises commissioned by various organizations. Court pointed out that the business is only a" special kind of activity, "not onerous commit transactions as such (see Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the Central District of 8 February 2006 № A48-2746/05-2). As the court in the actions of the citizens of business signs may indicate, in particular, the following facts:
- The manufacture or acquisition of property for subsequent profit from its use or disposal;
- Business accounting transactions related to the implementation of transactions;
- Interconnection of a citizen in a certain period of time transactions;
- Stable relationships with vendors, customers and other counterparties.
In this case, the very fact of the transactions on a commercial basis for the recognition of a citizen entrepreneur enough. According to the court such deals "do not constitute activity." In addition, the court found that in this situation there is no relationship between the new transaction and stable business relationships with contractors, as well as one of the important features of business - business risk. Sketch of the interior as a product of creative work does not involve the onset of any risk as essentially a more artistically designed variants of the individual elements in a room of furniture, paintings, n "
Added after 11 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Artoil-A
I have almost twenty years to pay taxes. Not for the property , and for the profession. Your understanding of the tax system based on your benefits.
|
Very well paying . And you have to pay them , because you do clean business, that creativity is irrelevant. You produce products which externally looks picture commercially. All the signs of business you have there .
Just do not cut into one of your brush. You are a professional hack , the art does not have a clue .
PS: You do not have to be here to show you a cheap copy of Briullov, only in vain disgrace.
