Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzran
Ha, you thought I was sold on the Wernicke pictures?
Wernick was not the place.
There might have to buy something from the DPI in the ignorant, but to sell the icons, for example.
But I bought it and painting, antique row, of course.
Are you one of their number with a souvenir picture in there and did not go.
By the way, at the expense
I, for example, to communicate with you, because I just is fun, fun.
But will all bear the hen, stop to talk to you and you will instantly be left here in silence as one finger.
|
On icons also doubtful. As far as I remember, there was not antiques, and were members of the Interior Ministry, who were looking for the stolen icons. And how are you not aware of any technology or history, being in an atheistic nihilism, can assess the icon. And with weak legal knowledge and
first encounter with law enforcement officers of many faces.
Added after 9 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от DSF
Dear administration! It may be worthwhile to provide a separate theme - "Taxation", for example, the post 307 or 322? Because the conversation has already gone too far, and to write on the theme, too, have that, and stop all together would not like. As you look at it?
|
I do not need. We have to discuss taxation only because of dense ignorance of some who suggest tax-free sales.
More. Will have to come back to this, because taxes and gallerists are 2/3 or more of the legal price of paintings of the artist.
Of course, if we talk only about the criminal sale, talk about taxes unnecessarily. But here the problem - the theme of crime in the sale of art is very high. And again there will be disagreement amateur dealers who do not have their picture and make buy-sell them to swear on an opening day.
There is another suggestion. Stop inspired lie, and the discussion of normative materials to give references.