[Laura]

The idea is that art, as it may sound corny, too products. How good movies, books and music, they are designed to meet the spiritual and aesthetic needs. As for the infrastructure thin. market a good idea to make the general stock market, index card with all the artists, popularity ratings that have access to them without intermediaries. But I did byne immediately separate caste rating specialists - people will be looking for them, not people's opinions. This again creates a poisoned environment specialists caste favorite artists. Perception is art at all people are basically the same, experts simply know more, because all the clever and can obskazat. A man in the street "feelings" sees.

In order to motivate the masses to buy paintings, we need promotion and advertising. We need more shows on TV about the artists and paintings, and articles in the coolest magazines. Even if the produce cheap catalogs (as recently made one major publisher of ships, planes, etc) about the artists, people with udosvolstviem would buy them, do assignments, and developed a taste for painting inreres. And then you see, and would buy paintings for themselves (and not for the interior!)

  We need creativity and a lot of money. Let gallery is invested and bread, can also afford sometimes promotions involving artists, with competitions for the best story, the best portrait, etc. We need to raise good young artists, not kompeechnymi prizes, then unih be motivation to do better . But one gallery is not cope, and together are unlikely to work, they'll competitors. In general, the utopia is all ... <- ~ 2 ~ ->