[artcol]

Сообщение от Seriy

You all right Artoil has explained, if the taxpayer is an employee (or a professor, he is bald does not matter, though this seems mostly), the taxes it pays a tax agent company, hired him. If he has additional income, in addition to payment of wage labor, - he is obliged to declare them separately as an individual.
Unlike in this case, IP, that individual persons have to pay a tax of 13%.
If he does not sell the picture, and write them as a hobby, there is no income, no tax.
You all this seems wild, because you have not encountered this bezvylazno and live in the province. If you had to do at least some business movement in the U.S. or Germany, for example, the issues of tax on the income you would not have seemed so fantastic.
In the U.S., one for the painting in several scroll thousand dollars will not pay in cash, check or card, then went to the bank information, and the recipient of the income is in the basis of IRS-Internal Revenew Service. Sooner or later (they make regular checks, but slowly, according to the plan) comes the turn of the income recipient, and then, in case of non-payment of taxes on income, will not find it.

The artist formally can not pay - this question is found.

It is a system like this - suspend all and all, just in case. In this it differs fundamentally from that in civilized countries. Forgive them, do not understand the high matters. Gentile. "Real Money."

Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от DSF

So I say:
1. Free artist (including retired) is not required to register as an entrepreneur and can paint freely and legally in their spare time.
2. Free artist has the right to sell their work by any convenient method it, is not paying any taxes on that income, under two simple conditions: pictures painted in the next three years can be sold up to $ 250,000 p. a year, the picture painted above may be sold for any amount.
It's simple. That's how it works. And no tax no fines.

It seems simple. What controversy? Do you want to pay and do not want to.