Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol
That's good, of course.
I'm just here in my practice, I can not remember when no inserts a purely visual or whatever, and then read about the medals, awards and prizes, exhibitions, membership, etc. - And how to insert! 
Not someone mb.
It will not reduce Alferov, in short. The question arose in his theme, but to him (his work) is not applicable. The man lived, worked. Works for me quite "vstavlyaemy", and think as if to a lesser extent the history of art knew - that would insert more <- ~ 5 ~ ->
Added after 3 minutes
It is difficult to deter, not to play along with you <- ~ 9 ~ -> |
Since then mnu mentioned, say
Alferov intrigued me solely as a person, as a representative of another species homo sapiens, with a different outlook and wonderful for me a way of life. He has a sweet, pleasing to the eye works, some I even took to his library of. But I understand they could not
.
Such work can be interpreted in different ways, based on their intellectual stock, spiritual, and practical experience. Everyone sees her. As well as a good instrumental and classical music, one sees his subject, the composer only gives direction.
I read an excellent interpretation of Shostakovich Bavilsky (I think in the New World), found, lay in Beskdku
. But he sees it, and I, on the other, because he's smarter than me immeasurably, and therefore he can tell more colorful and more, for "see" more. And I know a little, and therefore I can say little. But I can come up with the plot.