Цитата:
Сообщение от sergejnowo
blaze, the story itself , one of the main souvenir plots since the mid-19th century.
This , souvenirs , work in the century-old age , it is worth a penny , and such things in Europe is very, very much.
The story itself , originally came from the 16-17 centuries.
Optically visible at the age of the writing style and tone of pigments /dyes.
Indirectly, .... , for example an artificial craquelure complements the full picture.
The paint layer without damage , and any other signs of aging.
Your work may be a couple of months , a couple of years or even 20 - 30 years of age .
|
to sergejnowo
How do you define that craquelure artificial ? damage to the paint layer is
in the upper right corner (Photo 2 ) and lower left (photo 3)
to Us-tin
discussion at the next forum will be continued ,
the views of those present were divided.
discussion can be found here : "http://www.antik-forum.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=30135"
what is a copy of the picture you showed , I do not dispute
called into question for me is only the fact
novodelnaya the picture . I want to understand why come to this
conclusion.