Цитата:
Сообщение от Eugene
All repeat ... then about Malevich, now of Hurst ...
[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]
Yes "banal" art objects are in the 10-20 Hirst expensive paintings of Malevich.
|
not very repeatable. the fact of the matter is that Hirst's art is unable to shock anyone. it even a little bit surprised no one is capable. the only thing that comes to mind at the sight of Hirst's works - "that's what a fine fellow, a good business has developed. out of work has already sold 20 times more expensive Malevich: D Well done! maybe in the future and obrastet his art concepts such as "Hearst has changed the perception of all art, bursting into the market, and trampled it under him, made him take it (Hirst) rules of the game, arranged the sabotage of systems, put it to a pig" and so on (if already not overgrown). and will all read it, as now, Malevich and Kandinsky. may well be so, but then the "mass audience" has been finally turn away from contemporary art, thinking that he vparivayut any leftovers, and still love them and make ...
[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от Vladimir
heart he also did. Good heart, by the way ... And not even one, for different tastes.
|
but the hard spin and sold over 100 million he had not the heart, and skull: rolleyes: