The rules, as I guess the reality of preparing for a long time and during that time has changed.
However, ready to agree with the fact that on any level stuff will be offered here, the administration, as they say, neither hot nor cold. If, indeed, the "educational function" section of the a priori more important than this, then I have nothing to argue.
There are no innovations that would suit absolutely everyone. The thing is that the changes were positive IN GENERAL.
Irrespective of the photo sale, why not enter the list of participants who tried to sell 100%proven falshakov? What is not "educational function"? Maybe someone without the intention of trying to do it, then let yourself blame in the end, with every going to happen. As they say, once a ... - not my fault. And if a few Seen in this, then - a trend ...
On the example of the topic: In my opinion, the thing described is quite informative.
You can go to the section of artists and prices, look at these sample results Sudeikin and if you feel that you can about "fit" is to contact the seller for a photo, perhaps out of delicacy, first inquiring the price.
I repeat, do not urge to turn this approach into a regular practice, and allow it only for SERIOUS expensive things.
|