Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Guriev , Igor ; 2157421"
One does not look like it's 1913 , even on a greased reproduction .
Rather, it is shorthand Arbat 90 years later ...
|
Yeah ? And in my opinion - quite typical of the 1910s, landscape ..
Цитата:
|
Сообщение от John Preston; 2157551"
However, if recorded on an old canvas ...
|
Nope, nothing there , " recorded" . In the area of the signature on the loss of local areas ( to be exact - vykroshek ) paint layer is clearly visible ground ( and not the underlying paint layer ).
Canvas ( judging from pictures ) - ordinal , plain weave, fine-grained enough , and
rare, with large gaps between the threads of both the basis and on a duck . In a word - a typical cheap Canvas end of XIX - the first quarter of the XX century.
Soil - a single-layer , most likely - according to preliminary sizing .
A state of copyright colorful pastas - THIS CURRENT tinyscope . <! - ~ 7 ~ ->
Added after 29 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от dabbler
ordinal,
|
Ordinary, of course.
Ordinary.
In the presentation of a coherent system of vile crept ochepyatka ...
(Like, instead of a printed "
belly my comfort in high teremu" should read "
Lives my poison in high teremu")