Цитата:
|
Сообщение от OksanaD; 2151181"
reading the biography of V.D.Orlovskogo, learned this fact, that in Yaroslavl Museum holds the original or a copy, or artist. And the work was acquired in Yaroslavl is the people who, taking off the canvas to the stretcher, slightly tore it. A shot because they wanted to sell preserved on canvas without a stretcher, alleged he was so old that crumbled into dust. Someone could make a copy in those years?
And I, frankly, is my favorite picture is supposedly the original. (IMHO)
Just an assumption, do not pretend to ... Tell me where to make the examination
Thanks
|
A. Dear Oksana.
After reading the biography of Orel <! - ~ 7 ~ -> You are not in any way to draw out interesting information about Yaroslavl, allegedly filmed with a canvas stretcher (hereinafter - the text).
Two. In Yaroslavl is not a copy,
and one of the author's choices. It was written about it in detail.
Three. In your picture there is no signature. I personally (and therefore - and no, I'm sorry for the indiscretion), none knows the real picture of the completed V.D.Orlovskogo not signed by the master. Unsigned sketches - there are (and in many), but that - sketches, which the author himself much importance has never attached, and exhibited almost no life. (Almost all of them were first exhibited in the artist's daughter, A.V.Pimonenko, after the death of his father).
4. Due diligence (in Moscow) can be done in NINE them. Tretyakov and Artkonsaltinge. Sincerely, dabbler.