Цитата:
|
Сообщение от antikuz; 2099191 '
If you interested then please come to the gallery and ask for opinions from the organizers of the auction, I think it will be interesting to talk ....
|
Yes, actually all the
interesting ... I think after reading this thread some sort one hundred people would like to see.
I have eaten here personally just curious: a) on the basis of any research conclusions about the authenticity of such a clearly questionable activities?
b) What reference materials are involved (if at all involved) during the examination?
c) If any of the supposed author of a work has no basis in the Art Lab 'and, in any museums in Kiev, then the experts managed to go out. Is it possible to handle the timing drove the stock stuff? (That's really neither zhist not believe it. So they Petrov and let ...)
And finally, what kind of magic "chemistry" that can reliably confirm (!) Authorship of a master?
I think all of these questions are designed to meet purely academic interest of readers, no more.
And it is somehow strange:
you lay out for all to see some material, and when you turn to for an explanation - a sudden for no reason, no reason at all offended, and send further applied to instances ... (Already, come, a hundred times regretted that the shared information for? <! - 7 ~ ~ ->)
In the meantime, ask you questions - is not idle. And the forum comments about the future of the auction - it is weighted based on a fairly deep knowledge and practical experience.
OlegTsi, do not go there ...
(In any case - alone <! - ~ 1 ~ -> ...) I am afraid for you!