15.04.2012, 09:28
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#179
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Art-Galera
Pavel, my dear fellow, you are eco sights on the definition of art ... ... and even our children, and all - it's our problem ... school (!??) ... that they were civilized ... and even more so, that's about the fact that only the professionals in our schools ... and should be trusted ... Well this, I'm sorry too ...
You know, I think there are many examples. But I'm closer to the subject will try. Your first (sorry, I mean on this topic) article (Leo Tolstoy our) «What is Art?" Almost immediately the first example and just of a boy, who experienced fear after a meeting with the wolf later relates in such a way that the experiment, infecting the audience, makes them feel in danger, and that the boy felt. And this is a perfect example of a work of art, according to Tolstoy. Well, this example illustrates his thesis that "art should create a certain emotional connection between artist and audience that" infects "the viewer. This aesthetic concept led to the expansion of Tolstoy's criteria is a work of art. He believes that the concept of art embraces all human activities" .
Maybe I got a little sloppy (Mann and others continue to have spoken more accurately), but think about our children and their perceptions of culture and art in general, and "infect" in all possible ways of their art - it is certainly not the task of the school and our wonderful education system ...
|
That the school in which I was giving a good basis for the understanding of art because it gave the right direction in life.
|
|
|