As educated people, I suffered for some time, allowing the author of "fuflyachka" to justify his opinion. Yes, and reluctant to enter into discussion with him was not so, thanks to others who made it for me.
Today it is clear that there are no studies of it and not wait for more so in an amicable way to apologize to this man's head can not come (which really there "brandy for a bong!").
Instead:
Цитата:
|
But it is often under such directories and do falshakov.
|
"... In my circle" - the author forgets to add. However, it is natural that the habitue (judging by the number of references to this point in his posts) market in Izmailovo judge for themselves and their surroundings.
In general, Internet forum - not a bad place to raise self-esteem. But you can not just to shit, practicing in the rudeness of other members of the forum on personalities, but also feel a kind of gray eminence, Seeders witty murderous characteristics that influence the course of discussions about high-profile names, but often great.
That did not sit quietly merchant Nechitailo (see his posts). After all, would make interesting, vivid, first hand reviews Izmailovo exhibition. So, no, it does not plow in his field, he pulls in the CHA, to reason with an air of profundity about this salon:
Цитата:
|
A gorgeous Fyodor Antonovich Bruni (smart water) such as delayed .... price is $ 250,000 question. Also presented Schilder s /m $ 85,000 Sheaves, Osip Braz (large size of about 150 cm on the larger side portrait of a man in full-length) $ 180,000, Burchard (landscape x /m), about 50 cm $ 30,000 bargain. Big and beautiful winter Sergeev, but the price .... asking $ 400,000 (obviously exaggerated)
|
Here and there - wrote "fuflyachoks" and communicate with it already, ask him questions, that is, the task of drawing attention to his own person entirely resolved.
With regard to examinations, that someone is needed from me. I think that generally (at least in situations similar to this one) is that there are necessary expertise especially fans poumnichat wasted. For the real presence of the buyer papers review - minor matters. If he doubts the authenticity of the picture, you still find a way to verify this independently, thus making their own strong opinions.
The only thing I'm willing to help the issue, it is - make a small discount, approximately equal to the value of low-cost expertise to the next buyer could spend the difference on the solution of their doubts. For the authenticity of his stuff, of course, am responsible.
The tag is placed on exhibition with modern corrugated cardboard, apparently served as a backdrop when the picture was exhibited. On the original cardboard no markings there.
However, I believe that it is of great importance has not. Even whether label affixed directly to the old board, careful people would still say that it "might-stick in there with a different picture."