Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 15.02.2012, 21:30 Язык оригинала: Русский       #4
Гуру
 
Аватар для Pavel
 
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от I-V Посмотреть сообщение
Yes , it is. But there may be some in this grain of truth ? Suddenly, someone will be able to understand and explain what had Eugene Rastorguev mean? In a word , suddenly light up someone



He, as I understand it , largely wrote for myself - so inspirational flow of thoughts
In papers Rastorgueva angle of light is not very seen . I think that perspective is seen as an object from a certain point , but from a different point will be a different angle. Angle of light is probably the vector coverage of the subject. Cezanne had a slightly different view . It had a composite view of the connectedness of the plot. This includes drawing and tonal relationships and conventional lighting . There is also an academic , always light at a given angle . This led to excessive damage to the naturalness of expression.
In fact, the work of the artist in discipleship teroretiziruetsya only , and then, with experience comes a sense on the basis of the theory .
This is a very slippery topic.



Pavel вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Pavel за это полезное сообщение:
I-V (20.02.2012)