Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 31.01.2012, 23:46 Язык оригинала: Русский       #5
Гуру
 
Аватар для I-V
 
Регистрация: 29.08.2010
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 1,674
Спасибо: 8,645
Поблагодарили 3,910 раз(а) в 1,158 сообщениях
Репутация: 7825
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Maskit; 1951921"
in the discussion of this topic can be drowned in verbiage , better to cover specific situations .
It is hard to argue with that . But: the legality of a specific discussion of the figure ( Wasi Lozhkina ) in this thread http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...=147691&page=7 been questioned. "John Lozhkin not a member of the art market ," said a number of users. It was also believed that - member. Dispute ...

And so, in response to this argument , and I have formed the subject . Only because I did not understand : is there some kind of objective argument as to why this or that artist can or can not called participant in the art market. Or evidence of participation ( not participating ) only subjective , and each , in its discretion , is free to " decide for itself "? And how did discuss particular of the situation on the art market has not yet resolved this dilemma ?

The question, of course , I understand from the field , "What is truth?" , But still >




Последний раз редактировалось I-V; 31.01.2012 в 23:52.
I-V вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо I-V за это полезное сообщение:
Art-Galera (01.02.2012), Maskit (01.02.2012)