Цитата:
|
Сообщение от DimaB; 1944511"
media makes up each of these ratings in their own way. Not the fact that there sat these PROFESSIONALS.
|
Ok let's talk.
Why we do.
1. Because it's interesting, especially to those who came for the first time.
2. Rough understanding of the pricing is already possible to draw up, for example if
Цитата:
|
Vasily Vereshchagin. Taj Mahal in the evening. 2 [2.28] million pounds
|
What is clear when for some Styopa Fartuchkina will ask the same, you have to wonder if this is.
3. Rating, and especially his change, the rate of the state of affairs in this area. There are new records for that. We are website and update the investment or not these same records - a signal to the understanding of time to invest or not and in what. Well, there's a lot to write, the idea is clear.
4. A patient who is a Russian problem. For example, some easy to justify what must be regarded as a German Kandinsky, Chagall and French. And the debate on this subject can be to infinity. We took the easy - all born in Russia, you get a rating.
But why should I repeat the tongue-tied that we have already written:
Цитата:
On the criteria for inclusion in the list of the most expensive works of Russian artists is better not to philosophize. Otherwise, under the argument "how and why it was he who" is able to disperse any design, and not only "a dozen Russian." Just decided. First, participation should only take auction results - not only that they are reliable and accessible, but also usually superior to the objectivity of gallery transaction. Secondly, the question of belonging to the Russian artists were the principal decision: take the place of birth as such. Born in the Russian Empire or the Soviet Union, then, the Russian artist, without allowances for the way in the future fate. For example, the fact that Kandinsky in different years of citizenship and Russian, and German, and he died with the French, not a reason to doubt that the Russian artist. And the third rule: one artist - one picture. That is a situation where, strictly speaking, all the first place would have to take the works of Mark Rothko, are allowed as follows: leave only the most expensive work, and all other results for paintings by this artist ignored. Without this, you will agree, it would be interesting.
Clearly, based on the rating numbers when making investment decisions are not smarter than judge the beauty of wildlife on the achievements of the "Guinness Book of Records." However, one does not interfere, and this curiosity can only be welcomed.
|