Direct dialogue with the unique (in my subjective opinion) - Police creature, I am a little interesting, but for others reading this thread, I will explain about the pictures can not be bought AB.
I, like, quite understandably wrote, "For many years":
Цитата:
|
helper for many years without even listening to offers to buy paintings, always responding to their principled refusal: "No, I buy only books, pictures I do not need . " The only grounds for such a position has been concern about the purity of the collection, because, obviously, that the percentage of dubious authenticity in painting things immeasurably higher. He refused, apparently losing on this one, even from things hundred percent of very good houses. Just unsympathetic to him were all these games with confirmation-examinations, he shied away from them.
|
Clearly, it is about time that preceded the opening of the gallery in the House of Artists, and the period when B was in the shop on Prospect Mira, that is, about 90 and a part of the 2000s. A store is a store, it is not personal collection, there are other rules of the game.
And the man in this sense, B. was truly - special, so that, with a hypothetical example of a painting by Goncharova, from which B, as well as any other reasonable person supposedly could not refuse, too, is unconvincing. Personally, I bought on the recommendation of BS in the 90s with relatives of the artist painting a few things Olga Rozanova (well, nothing Goncharova?!). In this case no "kickbacks" and other forms of gratitude on my part did not specify in advance!
And, as I understand it, nothing but the criminal origin of collage until proven. Thus, this collage, irrespective of origin, getting to market, 90%still had to be in the collection of B., where else?! The rest of the proof, it is - the learned testimony bumbling criminals.
And generally, I think I agree with
Khmelev (Khmelev a Khmelev and sober thinking!)
Цитата:
|
someone, obviously, Mr. Borovkov greatly annoy. Can sell something that is not a man capable of such a rigid way of justice? How loud is not so long ago fired the gentleman Khochinsky - and where is he now? However, having no information other than the police, judge not.
|
. Here B. As far as I know, and he lost in conjectures ...
And yet, I would like to clarify for myself (I'm not an expert): In the 4 th page of television reports said that up to court BN could lose the property. If so, then the custom nature of the case it is confirmed. But, if the article is "konfiskatnaya," then why is the "property" is not even imposed a temporary arrest and BA still has access to it?