such a comparison is not clear for whom intended , with the shares of the players are not idiots , must be regarded as a commission when buying and selling , one must consider the costs of storage and insurance costs (purchase of shares are equal to zero) , and we must compare comparable - if the overall index, the general index of art market with the general index of the shares, if the most successful artists , from the most successful company shares . I guess in all parameters paintings lose.
When Lloyd Weber sold his Picasso bought twenty years ago , I figured that if he invested in anything other than pictures, it would be more vyigrashe .
In painting , there are other benefits , short-lived stock , compared with the paintings . After 100 years, 90 %of companies will disappear, and there is no Picasso .
|