Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Alec Sander; 1861781"
There was a painter Marc Chagall was a painter Pyatnitsky. The second is very similar to the first, but also broke into a completely different, parallel dimension, which is essential for the artist. Pictures Pyatnitsky (I'm not talking about Chagall) give a sense of belonging to some secret, to a certain otherness
|
I poklonitsa Pyatnitskiy creativity, and work of Alexander Pyatnitskiy have in my collection, but I have a job let E.Kurochkina.I here in this thread who will arrange debates of them is primary and the secondary one. and who influenced whom.? And where does such an analogy with Pyatnitsky? .. With Chagall, may well be something in the earlier studies have Shagalistoe so what? '. analogy here a few others should be .. from A. Ishin went a lot of our eminent hudozhnikov.Kotorye come to congratulate him tomorrow.
Well, like I do not like is your honest pravo.Aleksandr Ishin hudozhnik.Ya anyone prove nothing going.
I've give you the words of artist Dmitry Zhilinskis-
"We met with Sasha Ishin in the 60s. I then taught at the Surikov Institute, and he studied it. It was in his happiest time. We liked the old art, the real masters of their teachers. Young, just graduated from university, competed, who better to do its job, keeping in mind the commandment of Leonardo da Vinci: "The worst thing - to lose integrity."
For many years I was chairman of the youth and I remember vystavkoma of Ishin. He was always bright and varied praised the Russian countryside, its people and was sincere in his work, expressing what he saw and felt while having and abstract thinking. Ishin work - this is not plein air "as if the forehead." Much thought and expressed in terms of the subconscious, based on years of experience and "creative baggage." Even in his paintings I like to open, the local color - on the verge of the child's perception and in the spirit of his favorite artists primitives. Of course, he is entitled to his vision, his glorification and protection. This valuable work and Ishin. And yet they are valuable because they always seem powerful and expressive. As my mentor taught me, Vladimir A. Tabor: "That the work was not good, and the" Thing "and" thing "with a capital letter. Now, alas, many young artists are more focused on the commercial success of his work - this is their main purpose. Many are engaged in all sorts of "kinky" to "impose" a kind of pseudo-a "different sauce." For example, to score a nail, hung his boots and write: "Mum's shoes" and expose it. Beauty? In general, it can and funny, as an anecdote, but I am to this very hard. However, I believe and understand that true art is never lost, but it must be sustained. How did Obrosov, Andronov, Vasnetsov, and this support should be continuity among the younger artists - the main thing in any kind of art to love what you do and do it honestly. Ishin, of course, and has both - and love for his work, and skill, and honesty. "