Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 24.11.2011, 23:34 Язык оригинала: Русский       #6
Бывалый
 
Регистрация: 22.04.2010
Адрес: St Petersburg
Сообщений: 399
Спасибо: 258
Поблагодарили 707 раз(а) в 242 сообщениях
Репутация: 1403
По умолчанию

With all due respect , but I seem to be one of these secondary ? Chagall was a painter , was an artist Pyatnitsky. The second is very similar to the first, but also broke into a completely different , parallel dimension , which is essential for the artist. Pictures Pyatnitsky ( I 'm not talking about Chagall ) give a sense of belonging to some secret, to a certain otherness.

But the contemplation of paintings by the artist did not feel , but " it was already " and " but this is clearly the work of the mind." Painting should still go on something hidden, and not from the " eq I then cleverly turned ."

But maybe something I do not see it. Explain in this case. I would be very grateful. Really want to understand. Maybe I will understand better painting . Thanks in advance .



Алек Сандер вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Алек Сандер за это полезное сообщение:
Pavel (25.11.2011)