[iside]

Сообщение от fabosch; 1797223"

Iside, you dear habit of asking questions, no answers in the usual sense.

fabosch, heh > I'm trying to do something does not clutter up the information space on trifles, and so such questions are obtained, which can not or herself to find answers or next to no one who would help to understand why you have to write on the board.

Сообщение от fabosch; 1797223"

Pettibon not a plagiarist. Now this is called simulationism, that is the intentional use of others' images (in most cases, a well-known, because if the image is not "recognized" lost all sense made), made so that there is no doubt that playing someone else's work (although you can play even in other vehicles, such as painting a sculpture, or other material such as porcelain in a stainless steel pisuar), that is, it's like to put that in quotes to use quotations in a literary work - that is, look, it's not mine

It is for this thank you very much, just try to look for articles with the word simulationism. If you have any links please share please.
update: It turns LCR has opened up topic where it was writing about and I even read it and forgot.
LinkLink.
And searching on behalf of David Salle and Sherrie Levine leaves the term appropriation art is to say Hmm, interesting.

Сообщение от Maroussia; 1797233"

And every artist the right to use other people's ideas when creating his works

Thank you Maroussia, right-he has a right, but here I am interested in this practical point, if I, for example, as a young gallery owner decide to exhibit an artist who works in someone else's style and I see it, but present it as a mere "inspiration" and will let a competitor and then wrote in his Twitter, they're put up one that is all copied from such and such. An example of an exaggerated, but I'm here this border has not yet caught the like to be? Critics have not found here. >

Сообщение от Maroussia; 1797233"

amazing coincidence, just recently had a lecture to answer this question a claim to Mr. J. Newton Pusenkoff. Can be used as an example, only a court decision yet.

Maroussia, like is already there:

The discovery of Newton was not recognized by law
       One of the biggest scandals in the copyright field with the participation of Russian contemporary artists came from artist George Pusenkoff, now in its fifth year resident in Cologne. Like all contemporary artists who use elements of postmodernism, Pusenkoff used citation, using one of his paintings silhouette naked girl, posture, and even reflections and shadows, copy the model of one of the works of the famous photographer Helmut Newton, the famous series due to artistic nudes nude pictures. In the picture Puzenkov plagiarism is not very clear: a rough and unattractive (as opposed to the original) shows the silhouette of a girl deathly purple and black, and "all the fun" closes the yellow square. Actually, the work called Puzenkov quite ironic - "Power of Blue". As luck, that the painting was exhibited at the Venice Biennale and caught the eye of Maitre photos. Newton was outraged, believing that in front of him - the handiwork of malicious plagiarist. Pusenkoff, in turn, meant that the open source citation flattering to the author, because it - a sure sign of recognition of the artistic credibility of international importance. However, the master "on the world" not to go, clearly hinting Puzenkov attorneys that cite everything is possible, but subject to deductions related to the author. In the first phase immediately followed the trial in Hamburg Regional Court granted the petition of Newton, prohibiting the display picture Puzenkov and distribute its reproduction. Pusenkoff sold the painting for a very high price - 16 000 DM, while simultaneously filing a court appeal. On the day that was signed in print this issue of "Money", we caught up with Cologne, where the artist lives, over the phone. Here is what he George Pusenkoff:
       - Today I won the Newton process. I appealed to the Supreme Court in Hamburg, and this Court recognized that I was right. All of his absurd claims removed. After the first trial I was forbidden to exhibit the work, otherwise I was threatened with fines and prison almost. Now all these sanctions lifted from me, besides, Newton, pays all court costs are paid by lawyers. One might also submit a claim for compensation for moral damage, but it would be a different story. The absurdity of the situation, in my view, is that picture, an object made with his hands, it's a completely different area of ​​perception, than a photograph. Of course, this quote, but when used in the artwork quote, she used the stone as a tool used for construction - building and goes another. It may be, in addition, any other elements.
       Well, considering the volume of world-wide fame of Newton, of exceptional interest to the Western press has just completed the final litigation and unprecedented - few expected the court will take the direction of artist-émigré from Russia - the current owners of the ill-fated pictures this week could make a fortune.

This