Цитата:
|
Сообщение от iside; 1795693"
I wonder where the line between copying (plagiarism) style of one artist (a sculptor, an installer) and the influence that was exerted on one another. It's very interesting to hear how every man for himself opredyalyaet this time. If possible with examples.
Thanks in advance.
PS By the way, Richard Pettibone no one is accusing of plagiarism, on the contrary show suit and actively sold.
|
An amazing coincidence, just recently had a lecture to answer this question a claim to Mr. J. Newton Pusenkoff. Can be used as an example, only a court decision yet. I think this example interesting because it involves a Russian artist ...
From the subjective point of view: the artist can offend everyone. And every artist the right to use other people's ideas when creating his work. Yes, otherwise it can not be all the ideas have long been thought up before us.
From a legal point of view, the boundary runs along the boundary of the copyright. If you do not go into details, only the author of the original work or his successors to decide what kind of damage caused to their copyright, whether they should go to court to prove something, and so, considering all costs, and that they will benefit from this ... Or, conversely, it is better to use an extra opportunity to remind the world about the author of the original work and see what happens ... Everyone decides on their own, so probably nobody today and not in a hurry to blame anyone of plagiarism. Yes, and it is difficult to prove anything ... The judges are no less subjective than the artists. One word - the creators!
To paraphrase, it is necessary to "search for someone (at first) and what (specifically) favorably" at the moment. Well, that "everything flows, everything changes", I think, remind too.