Цитата:
Сообщение от Eugene
Marat Gelman: "Art is not obliged to be beautiful and clear"
|
I really liked this: By and large, collectors - are people who are willing to pay large sums of money, because they believe that because they can get into the story. Collection - is a kind of gloss of immortality. Man has always wanted and dreamed of overcoming death. There are several options. I will write a book, it will issue - I would die, and she left. Or head of a lot of children, they grow up to be like me ... Collection collection - is a way of overcoming death. Here Tretyakov - ordinary industrialist, which was much in Russia. But he was collecting, so stay in our memory and will come after us. Because the price of a work of art can be any. Faust was willing to appoint any price for immortality - and collectors for some things that can become the history of art, are willing to pay for a ticket to eternity. Happened not so long ago, two or three hundred years ago, when the art was to serve as storage of wealth. The whole world's money circulation anyway gradually settles in museums as works of art. It can not be. For example, we in Russia is a large organization Gazprom, the entire country rests on it. But the capitalization of Picasso, that is, the value of all his works - is somewhere half the value of Gazprom: 90 billion dollars. This means that the artist, not having any license, no natural resources, or pipes, or anything else, just with his talent, creates value, comparable to the huge production Makhinov, which tries to rule the world. It says what?