08.07.2011, 09:59
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#15
|
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от OlegTsi
The picture is not an auction.
The plaintiff made a very loud, bold and weighty statement on overpayment and that impairs the plaintiff himself. The fact that the painting was sold to Peter the Great Ivan Aivazovsky, bonfire at Krasnaya Gorka to signal their perishing ships was the largest painting in private hands in the U.S.. The size of the picture - 195 cm by 294 cm, is nearly 2 meters by 3 meters. I personally would like to have two such Aivazovsky today instead of one "Little Cowboy" Feshina. The picture was very rare, important and prominent and was acquired in Russia in 1930 at the American Embassy.
Based on the allegations of the plaintiff, the picture should be worth 20%of the $ 4 million, ie 800 thousand dollars. That's really ravings of a madman, absurdity and deception of the American court. Here is a concrete slip Arthur Properties.
If the prosecution of the overpayment in 80%of untruthful, but it really is, then the court can easily count the untrue accusations and the other plaintiff, are the basis of ship U.S. practice.
Photos - discussed the picture.
|
I'm afraid the buyer and the price is right Aivazovsky overstated. It is necessary to use the catalog price, perhaps Mayer in the U.S., rather than the results of dubious auctions.
|
|
|