Okay so, I will answer, even though you promised to ignore)))) Personally, I think the main thing - One feature rating. That's because he is an expert and controversial because it involves public interest. And its pouring mud just makes it more authoritative.
Another important thing: The union of artists. This is a real social security, come to us with a variety of issues, and we help as we can. Papers we have written for artists on their needs, perhaps, you can glue the globe)))
Yet it constantly feel the pressure all the creative unions, and it makes them more attentive to the problems of artists. His articles about the MOA and the PAX read, for example?
http://zagraevsky.com/rah.htm
http://zagraevsky.com/msh.htm
Another very bright personality ZAGRAEVSKY. Every word he does not fall into the void, because it attracts attention. And everything that he writes about the art market, attracting attention.
Another is that he created a unique and unique artistic style. This is our time, almost none of the artists did not succeed. And that someone does not like it, do not worry, the debate only attract viewers. I, too, many of the artists who do not like it, but I understand that in our time the very fact of creating something unique deserves great respect. And he's not written with! Have you seen his latest series - "12 months, the city of Russia," in 2011?
http://zagraevsky.com/paint_12_russia.htm
Just do not say that I was advertising))) You asked, I answered as best she could.