Цитата:
Сообщение от L-ana64110
" dabbler , one who is engaged in a science or art without special training , not having in-depth knowledge . " in 1992 by a glossary .
|
This is not so , knowledge of an amateur any more depth , much deeper than those who have something a professional finish. But they are one-sided and fragmentary . For example , from art history , he will know just what he likes, but will know all about it.